The Core of video Surveillance “Camera”

Cameras are actually the eyes of a video surveillance system. Cameras should be deployed in analytical areas to abduction accordant video.

The two basal attempts of camera deployments are

(1) Use asphyxiates points. 

(2) Awning assets.

Asphyxiate points are areas breadth bodies or cartage charge canyon to reach an assertive area. Examples accommodate doorways, hallways and driveways. Placing cameras at asphyxiate credibility is an actual cost-effective way to certificate who entered a facility.

Assets are the specific altar or areas that charge security. Examples of assets accommodate concrete altar such as safes and commodity areas as able-bodied as areas breadth important action occurs such as bank note registers, parking spots or lobbies. What is authentic as an asset is about to the needs and priorities of your organization. 

 Once you actuate what areas you appetite to cover, there are four camera characteristics to adjudge on:

1- IP vs Analog: The better trend in video surveillance today is the move from analog cameras to IP cameras. While all surveillance cameras are digitized to appearance and almanac on computers, alone IP cameras digitize the video central the camera. While best infrared and thermal cameras are still alone accessible as analog cameras, you can alone use megapixel resolution in IP cameras. Currently, 20% of cameras awash are IP and this allotment is added rapidly.

2- Fixed vs PTZ: A camera can be anchored to alone attending at one specific appearance or it can be adaptable through panning, angry and zooming (i.e., affective larboard and right, up and down, after piece and farther away). Best cameras acclimated in surveillance are fixed. PTZ cameras are about acclimated to awning added fields of angle and should about alone be acclimated if you apprehend an adviser to use actively the cameras on a circadian basis. A key acumen anchored cameras are about acclimated is that they amount 5 -8 times beneath than PTZs (fixed cameras boilerplate $100 - $1000 USD admitting PTZ cameras can be over $500 USD). 

3- Standard Analog vs. Megapixel: This best is agnate to that of TVs. Just like in the customer world, historically anybody acclimated accepted analog cameras but now users are alive into aerial analog cameras. While aerial analog TV maxes out at 3 MP, surveillance cameras can accommodate up to 16 MP resolutions. In 2008, megapixel cameras alone represent about 4% of absolute cameras awash but they are accretion actual rapidly. See an affirmation of megapixel cameras to apprentice more.

4- Color vs Infrared vs Thermal: In TV, a video can be blush or Colors and white. In video surveillance today, the alone time bearing a Colors and white angel makes faculty is back lighting is actual low (e.g., night time). In those conditions, infrared or thermal cameras aftermath colors and white images. Infrared cameras crave appropriate lamps (infrared illuminators) are adequately bargain for bearing bright angel in the dark. Thermal cameras crave no lighting but aftermath alone outlines of altar and are actual big-ticket ($5,000 - $20,000 on average) in day time or a fire areas, blush cameras are the accessible best as the exceptional for blush over Colors and white is trivial. 

 Best organizations will mix and bout a cardinal of altered camera types. For instance, an alignment may use Infrared anchored analog cameras about an ambit with an analog PTZ overlooking the parking lot. On the inside, they may accept an anchored megapixel camera covering the barn and a cardinal of anchored IP cameras covering the access and hallways.

DVR-Based Analog CCTV Systems... become online on internet

DVRs were eventually equipped with an Ethernet port for network connectivity.

This introduced network DVRs to the market and enabled remote video monitoring using PCs. Some network DVR systems in use today enable the monitoring of both live and recorded video, whereas some allow the monitoring of only recorded video. Furthermore, some systems require a special Windows client to monitor the video, whereas others use a standard Web browser; the latter makes remote monitoring more flexible.

The network DVR system provides the following advantages:

·         Remote monitoring of video via a PC

·         Remote operation of the system

Although DVRs provided great improvements over VCRs, they also had some inherent downsides. The DVR was burdened with many tasks such as the digitization of video from all cameras, video compression, recording, and networking. Additionally, it was a “black box” solution, that is, proprietary hardware with preloaded software, which often forced the end user to source spare parts from one manufacturer, making maintenance and upgrading expensive. Virus protection was also difficult to implement. Although the DVR was often a

Windows-based machine, the proprietary interface did not allow for virus protection. In addition, the DVR offered limited scalability. Most DVRs offered 16 or 32 inputs, which made it difficult to cost-effectively build systems that were not multiples of 16, for example, systems with 10 or 35 cameras.

DVR-Based Analog CCTV Systems

By the mid-1990s, the video surveillance industry saw its first digital revolution with the introduction of the DVR. The DVR, with its hard drives, replaced the VCR as the recording medium. The video was digitized and then compressed to store as many days’ worth of video as possible.

With early DVRs, hard disk space was limited, so the recording duration was limited or a lower frame rate had to be used. Due to the limitations in hard disk space, many manufacturers developed proprietary compression algorithms. Although they might have worked well, end users were tied to one manufacturer's tools when it came to replaying the video. As the cost of hard disk space decreased dramatically over the years and standard compression algorithms such as MPEG-4 became available and widely accepted, most manufacturers gave up their proprietary compression in favor of standards — to the benefit of end users.

Most DVRs had several video inputs, typically 4, 16, or 32, which meant they also included the functionality of the quad or multiplexer.

DVR system provided the following major advantages:

• ·         No tapes and tape changes
• ·         Consistent recording quality
• ·         Ability to quickly search through recorded video

Early DVRs used analog monitors such as TV sets for showing video.

However, because the DVR made digital video available, it became possible to network and transmit the digital video over longer distances. This function was first addressed by connecting a phone modem to a serial port on the DVR. Later, the phone modem was built into the DVR itself.

Although the ability to monitor the video remotely via a PC was a great benefit, the actual functionality was not extremely useful because the bandwidth available with phone modems was too low, often in the 10- to 50-kbps range. That meant very low frame rates, low resolution, or highly compressed video, which made the video more or less useless.

VCR-Based Analog CCTV Systems

CCTV system involved the use of analog cameras that were connected to a VCR for recording video. The system was completely analog. The VCR used the same type of cassettes as those sold for a home VCR. Each camera needed its own coax cable to run from the camera all the way to the VCR. The video was not compressed, and when recording at full frame rate, one tape lasted a maximum of eight hours. Eventually, a so-called time lapse mode was incorporated into the VCRs to make the tape last longer. The time lapse mode enabled the recording of every second, fourth, eighth, or sixteenth image. That was how the video surveillance industry came up with such specifications as 15 fps (frames per second), 7.5 fps, 3.75 fps, and 1.875 fps, because these were the only recording frame rates possible in analog systems that used time lapse recording. If several cameras were used, quads became another important system component. A quad simply took inputs from four cameras and created one video signal output to show four different images on one screen; hence, the name “quad.” This invention made the system a bit more scalable but at the expense of lower resolution.

In even larger systems, multiplexers became commonplace. A multiplexer combined the video signals from several cameras into a multiplexed video signal. This made it possible to record even more cameras, often 16 on one device. The multiplexer also made it possible to map selected cameras to specific viewing monitors in a control room. Still, all equipment and all signals were analog. To monitor the video, analog monitors connected to a VCR, quad, or multiplexer.

Although analog systems functioned well, the drawbacks included limitations in scalability and the need to maintain VCRs and manually change tapes. In addition, the quality of the recordings deteriorated over time. The cameras, for a long time, were also black and white. Today, most analog cameras are in color.

It is time to change from CCTV surveillance to IP surveillance.

Just as major technological shifts have impacted the music and telecommunications industries and the corporate setting, a major shift is now also happening in the physical security and video surveillance markets.

Video surveillance emerged as a viable market about 30 years ago, and the technology has matured year after year. The introduction of the digital video recorder (DVR) in the mid-1990s started to clear a path for a digital solution, but it was really a replacement for the VCR (videocassette recorder) and multiplexer. The DVR combined two products into one and added the benefits of digital recording, but it was still a box with analog inputs that simply recorded. New vendors entered the market but buyers did not change, and sales channels remained the same. The DVR signified an evolution in technology — not a revolution.

After a few years, DVRs were equipped with a communication interface that enabled the retrieval of recorded or live video from a remote location.

Initially, the interface was a standard serial port that connected to a phone modem, but eventually it became an Ethernet port, requiring the first collaboration with the IT department. However, for the most part, security systems within an organization operated under the radar of CEOs and CIOs.

In 1996, the world’s first network camera saw the dawn of light. That camera was the AXIS 200 , a camera that could send a small resolution image at one frame per second and four frames per minute if one wanted full resolution. The AXIS 200 was a product that was poised to replace and overtake the Web camera market for remote monitoring and Web attraction applications. For security applications, however, that camera was far from sufficient. Fast-forward a few years and the network camera had evolved significantly. It could deliver 30 frames per second, had built-in video motion detection, and had an image quality that was similar to analog cameras. All of a sudden, cameras were deployed for security purposes.

Back in 1996, most networks were 10-Mbit networks, and just the thought of putting surveillance video on those networks was unthinkable.

By the year 2000, 100-Mbit networks were commonplace, and by 2007, a common enterprise-class, 48-port network switch enabled Gigabit performance on every port and had the ability to stream video from thousands of network cameras at full frame rate via the 10-Gigabit backplane.

Remember that Moore’s law is still prevailing and technology development happens very fast — yesterday’s bottlenecks might become tomorrow’s opportunities.

Because of the open interface in the IT industry, independent software companies that build applications for video management started to emerge in Germany, the United States, Spain, Denmark, Japan, and Canada — essentially all over the globe. A new market was starting to take shape: the network video market.